Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Improving Electrofacies Modeling using Multivariate Analysis Techniques: A Deepwater Turbidite Case Study

Authors: L. I. Adoghe; O. S Aniekwe; C. Nwosu;

Improving Electrofacies Modeling using Multivariate Analysis Techniques: A Deepwater Turbidite Case Study

Abstract

Abstract In static and dynamic reservoir modeling, results have shown that the quality and accuracy of the models are dependent on the quality of rock and fluid property inputs e.g. facies, porosity, hydrocarbon saturation, permeability, net sand etc. used in creating the models. Electrofacies (facies defined using electric well logs) are a key property, since most other properties demonstrate some trend with facies. The typical workflow in modeling electrofacies uses well logs and some type of supervised or hierarchical (unsupervised) technique to cluster/ index the data into a number of groups (electrofacies). The input well logs however tend to ‘correlate’ or ‘anti-correlate’ (sometimes very strongly) and do not truly form a set of ‘independent’ variables that ‘sense’ different attributes of the facies. This paper presents a statistical technique for identifying and assigning electrofacies using a multivariate analysis technique (Principal Component Analysis (PCA)) to create ‘eigen-variables’ from well logs. These eigen-variables contain all the original information in the well-logs and, in contrast to the well logs, are unique and ‘linearly independent’; therefore resulting in log signatures that are much better used in predicting electrofacies. We have used this technique to model electrofacies in the Bonga Deepwater field, and the results presented in this paper show a very robust facies network (based on ‘Indexation Phase’ Self-Organizing Maps - SOM) with a higher predictive accuracy than achieved using the well logs directly.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!