Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Environmental Risk Management Capability: Advice on Minimising the Impact of Both Sonar and Seismic Offshore Operations on Marine Mammals

Authors: A. Mollett; C. Schofield; I. Miller; J. Harwood; C. Harris; C. Donovan;

Environmental Risk Management Capability: Advice on Minimising the Impact of Both Sonar and Seismic Offshore Operations on Marine Mammals

Abstract

Abstract There is growing concern about the effect of noise pollution from Offshore Operations on whales, dolphins, porpoises and other marine fauna both in the scientific and political communities. The general public, media and key decision makers are becoming more aware of the potential impact of such operations and this is increasing the pressure on organisations to manage their acoustic impact on the marine environment. The Environmental Risk Management Capability (ERMC - a software package developed by BAE Systems in collaboration with the Sea Mammal Research Unit (SMRU) and the Centre for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modelling (CREEM) at the University of St Andrews) is the first system to provide a quantitative, robust and repeatable risk assessment method of the potential impact of sonar on both human divers and marine fauna. To assist in the effective management of this impact, ERMC can provide the user with recommendations of potential mitigation measures, and more importantly supports a basis from which the user can continue to use active sonar whilst complying with their operating policies and legislative obligations to protect the environment. This paper will discuss how ERMC can be employed to provide a risk assessment for both sonar and seismic offshore operations which introduce sound into the marine environment. It will also discuss whether such an approach would provide a more flexible and reliable outcome to methods commonly in use today.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!