Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Trapeziometacarpal Arthrodesis or Trapeziectomy with Ligament Reconstruction in Primary Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis

A Randomized Controlled Trial
Authors: Vermeulen, Guus; Brink, SM; Slijper, Harm; Feitz, Reinier; Moojen, TM; Hovius, Steven; Selles, Ruud;

Trapeziometacarpal Arthrodesis or Trapeziectomy with Ligament Reconstruction in Primary Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis

Abstract

Both trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition and trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis are commonly performed procedures for the treatment of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of both treatments for symptomatic osteoarthritis of the thumb trapeziometacarpal joint in a randomized trial.Women who were forty years of age or older were randomized either to trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition or to arthrodesis with plate and screws. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at three and twelve months postoperatively with respect to pain, function (Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation [PRWHE] and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH] questionnaires), joint motion, strength, complication rate, and patient satisfaction.Forty-three patients were enrolled. Since we found significantly more moderate and severe complications following arthrodesis compared with trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (71% versus 29%; p = 0.016), the study was prematurely terminated before the sample size necessary to validly compare the two groups was reached. The higher complication rate for arthrodesis led to an increase in revision surgery (two of seventeen patients). Significantly more patients in the ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition group (86%) than in the arthrodesis group (53%) indicated they would consider the same surgery again under the same circumstances (p = 0.025). In both groups, PRWHE and DASH scores significantly improved over time; however, comparison of the groups showed that the results were similar.Women who are forty years or older with trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis have fewer moderate and severe complications after trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition and are more likely to consider the surgery again under the same circumstances than are those who undergo arthrodesis. Twelve months after surgery, the PRWHE and DASH scores were similar in both groups. We do not recommend routine use of arthrodesis with plate and screws in the treatment of women who are forty years or older with stage-II or III trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis.

Country
Netherlands
Keywords

EMC NIHES-01-50-01-A, Adult, Bone Screws, Arthrodesis, Carpometacarpal Joints, Metacarpal Bones, Middle Aged, Tendons, Postoperative Complications, Trapezium Bone, Treatment Outcome, Musculoskeletal Pain, EMC MUSC-01-46-01, Ligaments, Articular, Osteoarthritis, Humans, Female, Single-Blind Method, Range of Motion, Articular, Bone Plates

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    105
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
105
Top 1%
Top 10%
Top 1%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!