<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 14083154
Amputation surgery in children is different from that in adults primarily in the sites of amputation. In a child, all length possible should be saved and, wherever possible, amputation levels should be distal to epiphyses rather than proximal. Elective amputation in children to convert anomalous extremities to more satisfactory stumps should be considered individually and should not be done primarily except when the life history of the anomaly is well enough known to indicate that primary conversion is desirable. Complications of amputation in children are much less severe than in adults. Painful phantoms in my experience do not exist in children. Scars, neuromata, or spurs are not major problems in children and only rarely require revision of the stump. Bone overgrowth is the major complication of amputation in children. It is a manifestation of appositional bone growth and is not related to epiphyseal growth. It is best treated by revision of the stump; it should not be treated by epiphyseodesis and it is not so contra-indication to elective amputation surgery in children.
Amputation Stumps, Humans, Infant, Artificial Limbs, Prostheses and Implants, Child, Amputation, Surgical
Amputation Stumps, Humans, Infant, Artificial Limbs, Prostheses and Implants, Child, Amputation, Surgical
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 39 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |