
arXiv: 1509.05363
We show that for any sequence $f: {\bf N} \to \{-1,+1\}$ taking values in $\{-1,+1\}$, the discrepancy $$ \sup_{n,d \in {\bf N}} \left|\sum_{j=1}^n f(jd)\right| $$ of $f$ is infinite. This answers a question of Erdős. In fact the argument also applies to sequences $f$ taking values in the unit sphere of a real or complex Hilbert space. The argument uses three ingredients. The first is a Fourier-analytic reduction, obtained as part of the Polymath5 project on this problem, which reduces the problem to the case when $f$ is replaced by a (stochastic) completely multiplicative function ${\bf g}$. The second is a logarithmically averaged version of the Elliott conjecture, established recently by the author, which effectively reduces to the case when ${\bf g}$ usually pretends to be a modulated Dirichlet character. The final ingredient is (an extension of) a further argument obtained by the Polymath5 project which shows unbounded discrepancy in this case.
29 pages, no figures. Formatted using the Discrete Analysis style file
completely multiplicative functions, Mathematics - Number Theory, Erdős discrepancy problem, Dirichlet characters, Elliott conjecture, Arithmetic functions in probabilistic number theory, Irregularities of distribution, discrepancy, QA1-939, discrepancy, FOS: Mathematics, Mathematics - Combinatorics, Combinatorics (math.CO), Number Theory (math.NT), Mathematics, 11K38
completely multiplicative functions, Mathematics - Number Theory, Erdős discrepancy problem, Dirichlet characters, Elliott conjecture, Arithmetic functions in probabilistic number theory, Irregularities of distribution, discrepancy, QA1-939, discrepancy, FOS: Mathematics, Mathematics - Combinatorics, Combinatorics (math.CO), Number Theory (math.NT), Mathematics, 11K38
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
