
Dinsmoor (2001) rejects shock‐frequency reduction as a reinforcer for avoidance behavior, and considers this to be an invalidation of so‐called molar avoidance theory. This is a narrow view of operant avoidance theory, for which shock‐frequency reduction is by no means the only reinforcer.
Appetitive Behavior, Electroshock, Motivation, Reinforcement Schedule, Avoidance Learning, Animals, Association Learning, Conditioning, Operant, Humans, Models, Psychological
Appetitive Behavior, Electroshock, Motivation, Reinforcement Schedule, Avoidance Learning, Animals, Association Learning, Conditioning, Operant, Humans, Models, Psychological
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
