OZ Ilk nesrinden bu yana yuz yili askin bir zaman gecmis olan “Kalyanamkara-Papamkara” yazmasi uzerine bircok calisma yapilmis, cesitli problemleri icin farkli teklifler ileri surulmustur. Buna ragmen yazmanin muhtelif kisimlari gunumuze kadar cozulememis sorunlari barindirmaktadir. Bu sorunlardan birisi de yazmada yer alan eksik bir cumledir ve bizce bugun hâlâ aciga kavusturulamamistir. Yazmada yer alan bu cumledeki iki ifade farkli okuma ve anlamlandirma teklifleriyle aciklanmaya calisilmis, fakat bunlar soz konusu cumlenin anlasilmasi icin doyurucu olamamistir. Bu kismin dogru anlasilmasi metnin butunlugu icin de onem arz eder. Bu calismada daha once bu eksik cumle uzerine one surulen tekliflere yer verilecek, ardindan da bu teklifler uzerine bazi dusunceler ileri surulecektir. Ilk problemli mesele, birtakim etimolojik aciklamalardan sonra tarihi ve modern Turk lehcelerinden verilen orneklerle desteklenecektir. Ikinci problemli mesele ise, bizzat yazmanin kendisinden hareketle degerlendirilecektir. Gerekli gorulen noktalarda yazmanin fotograflarina da yer verilmistir. Soz konusu iki yapi aciklandiktan sonra, cumle icin yeni bir transliterasyon, transkripsiyon ve Turkiye Turkcesi cevirisi teklif edilecektir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Eski Turkce, Eski Uygurca, Kalyanamkara-Papamkara, Avadan. SOME THOUGHTS ON AN OLD UIGHUR SENTENCE ABSTRACT Many studies have been conducted on Kalyanamkara-Papamkara manuscript which more than hundred years have passed over its first publication and different proposals are suggested to its different sections. Despite this various sections of the manuscript contains the problems which couldn’t have been solved until today. One of these problems is the elliptical sentence contained in the manuscript. Basically the two important structures contained in the manuscript are tried to be explained by means of different reading and interpretations but they couldn’t have been sufficient to understand the said sentence. Thus, it prevented understanding of the whole of text. In this study, the assertions made on the elliptical sentence will be given place and then ideas about these assertions will be set forth. The first problematical structure will be tried to be explained by giving places to the examples from historical and modern Turkish dialects. The second problematic structure will be examined by dealing as manuscript centred entirely. The photos of the manuscript will be given place required for all these. Lastly, after the two structures explained, a new transliteration, transcription and translation in to Turkey Turkish of the said sentence will be offered. Key Words: Old Turkish, Old Uigur, Kalyanamkara Papamkara, Avadan.