
The research sought to apply formative research, using strategies such as information gathering, research seminar and monograph to improve communication and research skills in university students. These strategies were linked to a profile of a promoter teacher that manages research methodology and incorporates it into their pedagogical practice. The research corresponds to the quantitative approach and the experimental level, with a quasi-experimental design with pre- and post-test. The sample consisted of 77 students (experimental group) and 63 (control group), who were applied pre and post test to measure their communication skills (listening, speaking, reading and writing) and investigative (observe, describe, analyze, synthesize and interpret). The instruments used to collect data were the written test and the rubric. The statistical analysis was based on the difference of means with Z distribution, with a confidence level of 95.0%. The results reflect that formative research has positive effects in the development of communicative and investigative skills; having passed, after the experiment, the qualifications obtained in the pre-test at 4.12 points, going from a poor level to a good level. In terms of communication skills, knowing how to speak and know how to write were the ones that developed the most. In relation to investigative skills, the ones that developed the most were analysis, synthesis and interpretation. These results show that, due to its effectiveness, formative research must become a permanent and gradual activity in university education.
Investigación Formativa, Habilidades Investigativas, Investigative Skills, Habilidades Comunicativas, Strategies, Communicative Skills, Formative Research, Estrategias
Investigación Formativa, Habilidades Investigativas, Investigative Skills, Habilidades Comunicativas, Strategies, Communicative Skills, Formative Research, Estrategias
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 26 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
