
handle: 10230/45759
This paper analyses two pronouns in Catalan Sign Language (LSC) that refer to unidentified human referents: WHOˆSOMEup and ONEup. We first show that in contexts that discriminate between indefinite pronouns and existential readings of human impersonal pronouns, both pronouns pattern with indefinite pronouns. We then examine the semantic properties of the two pronouns. WHOˆSOMEup and ONEup contrast with respect to their number, compatibility with collective predicates, scope with respect to event iteration and domain restriction requirements. In terms of specificity, both pronouns are epistemically non-specific, but ONEup is interpreted as scopally and partitively specific while WHOˆSOMEup is neutral with respect to scopal and partitive specificity.
The research reported in this paper is part of the Franco-German ANR-DFG project Towards a typology of human impersonal pronouns (ANR-11-FRAL-0011, 2012–15). The work of G. Barberà was partly supported by the project GramRefLSC, Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, FFI2015-68594-P.
Comunicació presentada a la 21th Sinn und Bedeutung Conference, SuB21, celebrada del 4 al 6 de setembre de 2016 a la Universitat d'Edinburgh, Escòcia, Regne Unit.
epistemic indefinites, Catalan Sign Language, Specificity distinctions, Catalan Sign Language (LSC), Indefinite pronouns, specificity, scope, [SHS.LANGUE] Humanities and Social Sciences/Linguistics, Semantics
epistemic indefinites, Catalan Sign Language, Specificity distinctions, Catalan Sign Language (LSC), Indefinite pronouns, specificity, scope, [SHS.LANGUE] Humanities and Social Sciences/Linguistics, Semantics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
