Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Near‐Surface Electrical Resistivity Investigation of Coseismic Liquefaction‐Induced Ground Deformation Associated with the 2016Mw 5.8 Pawnee, Oklahoma, Earthquake

Authors: Folarin Kolawole; Estella A. Atekwana; Ahmed Ismail;

Near‐Surface Electrical Resistivity Investigation of Coseismic Liquefaction‐Induced Ground Deformation Associated with the 2016Mw 5.8 Pawnee, Oklahoma, Earthquake

Abstract

ABSTRACT The M w 5.8 Pawnee, Oklahoma, earthquake on 3 September 2016 produced the largest moment release associated with induced seismicity in the southcentral United States. The earthquake ruptured a previously unknown west‐northwest–east‐southeast‐trending left‐lateral strike‐slip fault, named the Sooner Lake fault (SLF). Unlike the previous earthquakes in Oklahoma, the Pawnee earthquake produced coseismic liquefaction‐induced surface deformations including fractures, sand blows, and lateral spreading. In this study, we used high‐resolution electrical resistivity tomography to image the zones of surface deformation. We also mapped the fracture orientations and compared them with the mainshock and aftershock pattern in the area of the earthquake to elucidate the relationship between the surface deformation and the causative fault. Our results reveal that (1) fractures and sand blow sites are located 2–9 km from the SLF, consistent with patterns of distributed deformation; fracture azimuths vary between 93°–116° and 110°–250° (subparallel and orthogonal to the 109° strike of the SLF); (2) sites of sand blow and ground fracture occur within the zone of maximum recorded ground shaking and are underlain by Quaternary alluvial sediments; (3) mega fractures (34 cm wide and up to 226 m long) oriented parallel to river meanders resulted from lateral spreading; and (4) liquefaction sites are underlain by low electrical resistivity (

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    17
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
17
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!