
We test the role of phonetic grounding and typological tendencies on learning biases for vowel height harmony, a phonological process in which vowels within a word are required to share phonological features for height. Several height harmony languages are constrained such that vowels ([i, e]) undergo harmony following both front and back vowels, while back vowels ([u, o]) tend to only undergo harmony following other (often identical) back vowels. In Experiment 1, participants were trained on a height harmony pattern with either front vowel suffixes or back vowel suffixes. Participants reliably displayed harmonic responses only when the suffixes contained a front vowel, despite exposure to back vowel suffixes. Experiment 2 tested for generalization to novel vowel harmony triggers, exposing learners to tense front and back vowel stems or front vowel stems, with a front vowel suffix alternation. Participants generalized to front lax vowels but did not generalize to tense back vowels, suggesting a bias for height harmony languages in which the trigger and target share the same value for backness.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
