Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

START Foundation: Coping with Bias and Fairness when Implementing and Using an AI System

Authors: Chiara Schwenke; Julia Brasse; Maximilian Förster; Mathias Klier;

START Foundation: Coping with Bias and Fairness when Implementing and Using an AI System

Abstract

START Foundation annually supports nearly 200 young people with a migratory background through an individualized scholarship program aimed at personal development and identity building. In 2022, START Foundation expanded its reach by launching a digital learning platform, which faced challenges such as information overload and navigation difficulties due to a growing number of courses and a lack of individual support. To improve user experience on the digital learning platform, START Foundation explored implementing a recommender system for personalized course navigation based on methods from the field of artificial intelligence (AI). However, this exploration raised ethical concerns, particularly regarding bias and fairness in AI systems. In light of these concerns, the following questions emerged: Should START Foundation integrate the AI-based recommender system into its digital learning platform? If so, what factors should START Foundation consider regarding bias and fairness in its AI-based recommender system in order to prevent negative consequences for its scholars? Readers are encouraged to explore the interactive learning module on bias and fairness in AI systems, available at https://bias-and-fairness-in-ai-systems.de/en/home/.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!