Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ https://dx.doi.org/1...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fq...
Article . 2004
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Angewandter "Methodenmix"? Gruppendiskussionen und schriftliche Befragungen am Beispiel eines Vorstudienmodells in der Hochschulevaluation

Applied Methodical Mixture? Group Discussions and Paper & Pencil Interviews as a Preliminary Study in the Evaluation of Higher Education
Authors: Ernst, Stefanie;

Angewandter "Methodenmix"? Gruppendiskussionen und schriftliche Befragungen am Beispiel eines Vorstudienmodells in der Hochschulevaluation

Abstract

Am Beispiel eines Vorstudienmodells in der Hochschulevaluation wird die praxisrelevante Verknüpfung quantitativer und qualitativer Methoden der Sozialforschung aufgezeigt. Struktur-, Ergebnis- und insbesondere Prozessqualität sind dabei unterschiedliche Ebenen, die im komplexen Hochschulalltag erfasst und gemessen werden müssen. Der hier lediglich im Ausschnitt vorgestellte Projektbericht zeigt nicht nur generell die Suche nach geeigneten Indikatoren von Qualität, er exemplifiziert im Ringen um die Benennung einer "kritischen Masse Studierender" vielmehr auch, welche Herausforderungen sich für die künftige Entwicklung spezifischer Indikatoren für Prozessqualität (hier: erfolgreiche Lehr-, Lern- und Beratungsprozesse) stellen. Im heterogenen und hierarchischen Setting der Hochschule mit ihren unterschiedlichen Akteurinnen und Akteuren stellen Gruppendiskussionen in Verbindung mit schriftlichen Befragungen einen adäquaten Methodenmix dar, um diese spezifischen Indikatoren für Qualität zu generieren. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs040231

La relación aplicada entre los métodos de investigación social cuantitativos y cualitativos, que se trata en este artículo, está basada en un modelo pre-estudiado. Los diferentes niveles de calidad se refieren a la calidad de estructura, procesos y resultados en este contexto de investigación. Estos tienen que ser medidos dentro del complejo contexto de la vida académica. En este artículo se presenta sólo una parte de la información seleccionada del conjunto del informe sobre la búsqueda de indicadores de calidad adecuados usando datos empíricos. Además, se ejemplifican los desafíos de desarrollar nuevos indicadores para los procesos de calidad (aquí: calidad del aprendizaje, docencia y consultoría). La combinación de grupos de discusión y entrevistas con lápiz y papel es una buena mezcla metodológica para generar estos indicadores de calidad específicos en el complejo y jerárquico espacio académico. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs040231

The applied connection between quantitative and qualitative methods of social research, dealt within this paper, is based on a pre-study model. The different levels of quality refer to the quality of structure, process and outcome in this research context. These have to be measured within the complex context of academic life. Only selected information from the entire report on the search for proper indicators of quality using empirical data is presented in this paper. Moreover it exemplifies the challenges of developing new indicators for process quality (here: quality of learning, teaching and consultation). The combination of group discussions and paper & pencil inquiries is a good methodical mixture to generate these specific indicators for quality in the complex and hierarchical setting of academia. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs040231

Keywords

Integration, integration, Indikatorenbildung, quality assurance, Modell, entrevista, Qualitätsentwicklung; Standards; qualitative data analysis; constant comparative method; theoretical sensitivity; desarrollo de calidad; evaluación; indicadores; investigación cualitativa; investigación cuantitativa; grupo de discusión; entrevista; integración;, Forschungsarten der Sozialforschung, investigación cuantitativa, Qualitätsentwicklung; Evaluation; Standards; qualitative Methoden; quantitative Methoden; Gruppendiskussion; Befragung; Integration, constant comparative method, Evaluation, grupo de discusión, Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie, evaluation, qualitative Methoden, Befragung, evaluación, development of methods, Research Design, Methodenentwicklung, Grounded Theory, investigación cualitativa, grounded theory, Qualitätssicherung, Standards, qualitative Methode, integración, construction of indicators, group discussion, qualitative data analysis, university, quantitative Methoden, basic research, survey, desarrollo de calidad, Social sciences, sociology, anthropology, Erhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaften, model, Hochschule, quantitative Methode, Gruppendiskussion, indicadores, theoretical sensitivity, quantitative method, Methods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methods, qualitative method, Qualitätsentwicklung, Grundlagenforschung, ddc: ddc:300

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Published in a Diamond OA journal
Beta
sdg_colorsSDGs:
Related to Research communities