
pmid: 23250025
Ethics and its relation to testing are historically an important question and still are. In this article, we briefly report on how neuropsychology emerged as a specific field, how tests are developed and we particularly focus on the ethical conditions under which a test can be administered. The point of view of the neuropsychologist who develops a new test, of the neuropsychologist who uses this test, of the person requiring a neuropsychological assessment, and finally of the subject, are respectively taken. In each case, different ethical questions are raised. Illustrations and examples are provided. A misunderstanding of what a test really is (a given and precise experimental situation) leads to many difficulties. Furthermore, many fail to know that neuropsychological assessment requires specific skills and clinical practice. A test is not related to truth or to a verdict; it only allows classifying a performance with regard to a given norm.
Male, Psychometrics, assessment, 150, neuropsychology, Neuropsychological Tests, Diagnosis, Differential, Patient Education as Topic, Alzheimer Disease, Reference Values, Humans, Ethics, Medical, Cooperative Behavior, Aged, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, ethics, tests, [SDV.NEU]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC], Female, Interdisciplinary Communication, Clinical Competence, Comprehension, norms
Male, Psychometrics, assessment, 150, neuropsychology, Neuropsychological Tests, Diagnosis, Differential, Patient Education as Topic, Alzheimer Disease, Reference Values, Humans, Ethics, Medical, Cooperative Behavior, Aged, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, ethics, tests, [SDV.NEU]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC], Female, Interdisciplinary Communication, Clinical Competence, Comprehension, norms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
