Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Soil matrix suction: some examples of its measurement and application in geotechnical engineering

Authors: A. M. Ridley; K. Dineen; J. B. Burland; P. R. Vaughan;

Soil matrix suction: some examples of its measurement and application in geotechnical engineering

Abstract

Soil matrix suction is assuming an increasing importance in geotechnical engineering. It is now recognised that soil suction is not confined to arid or semi-arid regions of the world. It is frequently encountered in a great many geotechnical problems in temperate climates. For example, all fills and compacted soils have an inherent suction when they are formed; many slopes, both natural and man-made, have in-situ suctions; and all samples that are removed from the ground during a site investigation possess a soil suction in their unconfined state. Measurements of soil matrix suction can be used to: (a) identify disturbance and/or desiccation in samples removed from the ground; (b) estimate the average in-situ effective stress once the effect of disturbance and/or desiccation has been quantified; (c) apply more rigorous controls to the compaction of fill materials where swelling is likely to cause problems; and (d) assess the stability in natural and engineered slopes. This paper describes and compares three methods of matrix suction measurement: the filter paper method, the Imperial College suction probe, and a new in-situ tensiometer that is well suited to long-term observations of in-situ suctions up to about 90 kPa. The principles of their operation, the procedures by which they can be routinely used, and advice on how the results can be interpreted, are presented.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    100
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
100
Top 1%
Top 1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!