
doi: 10.1557/proc-378-869
AbstractThis paper presents the comparison of the structural and electrical characteristics of Si/Si bonded interfaces depending on whether the surface layers were rendered amorphous by high dose ion implantation prior to annealing or not. While the general structure of the interfaces is the same when the wafers are preamorphized more precipitates are seen in the interface along with a few extended defects propagating into the volume. The most striking difference between both procedures is that the Spreading Resistance profile is more complicated in shape and difficult to master in the case of preamorphized wafers. Careful TEM analysis shows that only in this case the interfacial region is stressed in contrast with the fully relaxed structure obtained by direct bonding of crystalline wafers.For these reasons, there is little chance that the preamorphization technique will benefit to the bonding procedure of direct Si wafers.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
