Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Granìarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Granì
Article . 2019 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Granì
Article
License: CC BY
Data sources: UnpayWall
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Chaos in Heinrich Rickert’s Philosophy

Chaos in Heinrich Rickert’s Philosophy

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze what neo-Kantian Heinrich Rickert designates by the term‘chaos’. I argue that using this term Rickert means infinite manifolds of human life experiences, thatphilosophers have to convert into ‘cosmos’ of theories by using concept formation. Rickert thinks thatcognition orders chaos. I show that Rickert’s version of ‘chaos’ is different from the ones that were expressedby I. Kant, J. G. Herder, F. W. von Schelling, F. von Schlegel, and F. Nietzsche. I also argue that ideas ofI. Kant influenced the formation of Rickert’s ideas on chaos. Heinrich Rickert uses the term ‘chaos’ in hisepistemological theories that describe the process of cognition. Rickert claims that chaos is a raw materialfrom which a philosopher can form concepts for understanding the world and life. When creating concepts,the building blocks of theories, we order this chaos by dismembering it and marking essential relationships,separating them from non-essential ones. According to Rickert, ways of scientifically grasping reality suchas generalizing and individualizing help us dismember and order the ‘chaos’ of our experiences, creating a‘cosmos’ of theories. Rickert correlates the terms ‘cosmos’ and ‘form.’ He believes that philosophers haveto provide the idea of the clear distinction between form and content and have to see, in the same way,the distinction between cosmos and chaos. Philosophers, with their concepts, can give form to the chaosof experiences of the world and life, that is, they can create theoretical cosmos. Rickert states that only asystem of concepts can order chaos into cosmos. Concepts that are not part of a system cannot represent theworld as a whole. They represent only separate parts of the world, thus they cannot create a ‘cosmos’ as anordered whole. Therefore any philosophy must be formed by a system. Another important part of Rickert’sideas on chaos is his thought that ordering chaos has utility for a person. Through this activity we subduethe chaos of experiences of the world and life and it gives us the possibility of being oriented in reality andto gain mastery over it.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
gold