
This writing discusses the contribution of the laissez-faire of Rashīd Ridā’s ḥadīth, which includes the historicity of ḥadīth. According to him, the first ḥadīth writer was Khālid bin Mi’dān al-Himsī, a tabi’in in the 1st century A.H., not al-Zuhrī. The authority of ḥadīth, as a general rule in religion, is considered to be the Qur’an and mutawatir amaliyyah ḥadīth. The emphasized authenticity aspect of the ḥadīth in terms of sanad is to avoid excessive fanaticism in a madhhab. From the aspect of matan, he rejects ḥadīth containing strange elements, such as ḥadīth about signs of the Day of Judgment, Dajjal, the Mahdi of the end times, the descent of the Prophet Isa (Jesus), and others. He also uses contextual and interstitial interpretation, believing in understanding the ḥadīth along with its relevance to the social conditions of the Prophet Muhammad, returning its meaning to the Qur’an.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
