
This thesis explores the principles of administrative punishment within the legal framework of the Council of Europe with a special emphasis on the case law of European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). The thesis seeks to gauge the scope of individual protection that one might expect with regard to administrative sanctions as well as to identify cases, in which such protection may be insufficient. The thesis concludes with the idea that even though the ECtHR views administrative sanctioning as an ‘organic’, multi-pronged system, there are instances, where procedural safeguards which could have been invoked at the administrative sanctioning level, remain undeveloped.
340, administracinis baudimas, ECHR, Engel kriterijai, administrative sanctions, administracinės sankcijos, EŽTT, Council of Europe, administrative punishment, Engel criteria, EŽTK
340, administracinis baudimas, ECHR, Engel kriterijai, administrative sanctions, administracinės sankcijos, EŽTT, Council of Europe, administrative punishment, Engel criteria, EŽTK
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
