
doi: 10.1515/jaa.1998.19
The aim of the paper is to compare the behaviour of sets with respect to symmetric porosity and porosity. The authors have found several similarities as well as several differences. As an example of the first let us quote the following Theorem: If \(0< p<1\) and \(E\) is a closed, \(p\)-symmetrically porous set, then there exists a number \(q\), \(p< q<1\), such that the set \(\{x\in E: \text{sp} (E,x)\geq q\}\) is residual in \(E\). The difference is exhibited in the following example: Given \(0< p<1\), there exists a \(G_\delta\) set \(E\subset [0,1]\) such that for each \(x\in E\), \(\text{sp} (E,x)=p\).
Classification of real functions; Baire classification of sets and functions, porosity, symmetric porosity
Classification of real functions; Baire classification of sets and functions, porosity, symmetric porosity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
