<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Shakespeare's Sound Government: Sound Defects, Polyglot Sounds, and Sounding Out

Name: Shakespeare's Sound Government: Sound Defects, Polyglot Sounds, and Sounding Out
Creator: Parker, Patricia
Keywords: GR1-950, PL1001-3208, Chinese language and literature, 10. No inequality, Folklore, 004, 3. Good health

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Part of book or chapter of book , Article 01 Oct 2009 United States Publisher:McGill-Queen's University PressJournal:Oral Tradition, volume 24 (eissn: 1542-4308,

Authors: Parker, Patricia;

doi: 10.1515/9780773596894-009 , 10.1353/ort.0.0059

handle: 10355/65188

Shakespeare's Sound Government: Sound Defects, Polyglot Sounds, and Sounding Out

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Shakespearean sound effects (or sound defects) depend not only on hearing with the eye (as in Sonnet 23) but also on seeing with the ear, including through the vivid reports of the nuntius or messenger who produces not "ocular proof" but what might be called a (potentially unsound) "evidence effect," turning the ear into a substitute oculus or eye (Erasmus 1978:577).

Country

United States

Related Organizations

University of Missouri Health System
United States

Keywords

GR1-950, PL1001-3208, Chinese language and literature, Folklore, 004

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	8
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average