Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Türkoloji Dergisiarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Türkoloji Dergisi
Article
Data sources: UnpayWall
Türkoloji Dergisi
Article . 2010 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Orta Asya Türk dillerinin bazı ortak özellikleri

Authors: JANKOWSKİ, Henryk;

Orta Asya Türk dillerinin bazı ortak özellikleri

Abstract

Bu çalışmada beş Orta Asya’daki Türk dilinin, başka akraba dillerden farklı olan söz varlığı ve gramer özellikleri incelenmektedir. İncelenen diller Türkmence, Kırgızca, Kazakça, Özbekçe ve Uygurca. En yaygın kabul edilmiş sınıfladırmaya göre, Türkmence Oğuz ya da Güney-Batı, Kırgızca Kıpçaklaşmış Altayca, Kazakça Kıpçak ya da Kuzey-Batı, Özbekçe ile Uygurca ise Güney-Doğu Türk grubuna girer. Tasnif bakımından söz konusu diller farklı gruplara ait olsa bile, dil etkileşimi ve bazı ortak etkenlerden dolayı ortak çizgilere sahiptirler. Bu etkenler, tarih boyunca pek çok ortaklık meydana getiren bölgenin tarihî, dinî, coğrafî, siyasî, iklim ve doğa şartlarıdır. Başka bir önemli etken, Çağatayca diye adlandırılan ortak tarihî edebî dil tesiridir. Çağataycanın etkisi en çok Özbekçe ile Uygurcada yansıtılırken, söz dağarcığında öteki dillerde de bulunmaktadır. Etkileşimsel ve yöresel benzerlikler açısından araştrılan diller arasında bulunan ortaklıklar eşit değildir. İncelemede Ana Türkçeden miras edilmiş, başka Türk dillerinde de var olan temel kelimeler ele alınmamıştır

This paper examines common features in lexicon and grammar of five Turkic languages of Central Asia. The languages that are subject of study are Turkmen, Kirghiz, Kazakh, Özbek, and Uighur. Turkmen is a south-western or Oghuz, Kirghiz a Kipchakized Altai, Kazakh a north-western or Kipchak, while Özbek and Uighur are south-eastern languages. Although these languages belong to different genealogical and geographical groups, due to language contacts and some extralinguistic factors they developed a lot of common features. Among these factors there are historical, religious, geographic, political, climatic and ecological forces. Another important factor is the impact of a common literary Eastern Turkic language called Chaghatai. Direct inheritors of Chaghatai are Özbek and Uighur, but Chaghatai influence is present in the lexicon of all other languages surveyed here. Naturally, common features are not equal in these languages. The features inherited from Common Turkic which manifest themselves in these and many other Turkic languages fall beyond the scope of research

Keywords

Türk dilleri;Orta Asya;ortak özellikler, Turkic languages;Central Asia;common features

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
bronze