
In this study, a new approach is presented that combines forest phenology and Landsat vegetation indices to estimate evergreen understory bamboo coverage in a mixed temperate forest. It was found that vegetation indices, especially thenormalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) derived from leaf-off (winter) images were significantly correlated with percent understory bamboo cover for both deciduous and mixed coniferous/deciduous forests. Winter NDVI was used to map bamboo coverage using a binary decision tree classifier. A high mapping accuracy for understory bamboo presence/absence was achieved with an overall accuracy of 89 percent (k 5 0.59). In addition, for the first time, we successfully classified three density classes of bamboo with an overall accuracy of 68 percent (k 5 0.48). These results were compared to three traditional multispectral bandsbased methods (Mahalanobis distance, maximum likelihood, and artificial neural networks). The highest mapping accuracy was again obtained from winter images. However, the kappa z-test showed that there was no statisticaldifference in accuracy between the methods. The results suggest that winter is the optimal season for quantifying the coverage of evergreen understory bamboos in a mixed forest area, regardless of the classification methods use.
forests, NRS, land-cover classification, leaf-area, satellite imagery, sensing data, giant pandas, ADLIB-ART-2761, ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE, decision tree, foping-nature-reserve, remotely-sensed data, vegetation indexes
forests, NRS, land-cover classification, leaf-area, satellite imagery, sensing data, giant pandas, ADLIB-ART-2761, ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE, decision tree, foping-nature-reserve, remotely-sensed data, vegetation indexes
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 28 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
