
Today the Iron Triangle (cost, time and quality) is insufficient as a sole factor of a project’s success. Other criteria need to be considered, which will allow stakeholders to accept results of the project. Underestimating these factors can lead to a negative attitude by stakeholders and thus to obstructions while implementing the project, which in turn can cause the Iron Triangle criteria not to be fulfilled – cost overruns, exceeded time schedule etc. This article presents a structured review of the theoretical issues of project management related literature and based on practical experience in managing construction projects, the authors propose criteria for evaluating the success of these projects. The proposed criteria and their influence on a project are demonstrated in a case study on a selection of construction projects. This article also gives a possible practical approach to evaluate a project’s success.
HF5001-6182, Project management, project success criteria, Business, triple constrain, project success evaluation
HF5001-6182, Project management, project success criteria, Business, triple constrain, project success evaluation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
