
doi: 10.14264/336019
Ethnicity, on the whole, has not been considered to be of great importance in anthropology. Although, in reality, anthropology has probably been concerned with ethnicity in a wide variety of contexts, it chose to view many of the cultures it studied as discrete entities, each with its own particular cultural tradition that distinguished it from other groups. Its concentration on studying 'whole' societies contributed to this lack of treatment of group identification and identification by outsiders. Yet, it is becoming more and more accepted that ethnicity plays a major role in social relations, both in individual identification, and relations between groups. Providing a sense of belonging for the individual, as well as security and a set of values,"one could probably regard ethnicity as the culture of basic human relations and of group survival, to which all other aspects of life are subjugated" (Kolm 1970:66). ...
Chinese, Ethnicity, Department of Anthropology and Sociology, 1608 Sociology, Brisbane
Chinese, Ethnicity, Department of Anthropology and Sociology, 1608 Sociology, Brisbane
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
