
This study is an investigation into the characterization of commercial activated charcoal, sawdust charcoal and rice husk charcoal as adsorbents for water treatment. The ground rice husk and waste sawdust collected, were sieved to obtain a nominal size of 1mm, washed and oven-dried for 12hours. The two materials were pyrolysized in a furnace for 30minutes, and the chars produced were later air-dried. The three charcoals (sawdust charcoal, rice husk charcoal, and the activated charcoal purchased from the market) were all subjected to X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) analysis, Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) analysis and Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis in order to characterize the filter materials. The SEM analysis showed that the three materials developed more pores, which is a property of an adsorbent. Likewise, the XRF and EDX analyses confirm that all the three adsorbents possess larger proportion of Silica, Carbon and Oxygen.
Composite material, Pulp and paper industry, Activated carbon, Social Sciences, Organic chemistry, Management Science and Operations Research, Decision Sciences, Evolution of Risk Management Strategies and Techniques, Engineering, Carbon fibers, Fiber, Waste management, Biology, Botany, Composite number, Scanning electron microscope, Sawdust, Bamboo charcoal, Materials science, Nuclear chemistry, Chemistry, Charcoal, Metallurgy, Activated charcoal, Husk, Adsorption
Composite material, Pulp and paper industry, Activated carbon, Social Sciences, Organic chemistry, Management Science and Operations Research, Decision Sciences, Evolution of Risk Management Strategies and Techniques, Engineering, Carbon fibers, Fiber, Waste management, Biology, Botany, Composite number, Scanning electron microscope, Sawdust, Bamboo charcoal, Materials science, Nuclear chemistry, Chemistry, Charcoal, Metallurgy, Activated charcoal, Husk, Adsorption
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
