
handle: 10366/129610 , 11162/197471
Se presentan los resultados de una investigaci?n que buscaba analizar las pr?cticas de lectura digital de estudiantes universitarios y la manera como estas pr?cticas son orientadas por los docentes e instituciones de educaci?n superior. El dise?o de investigaci?n fue mixto y el tipo de estudio descriptivo de corte transversal. Las t?cnicas de recolecci?n de informaci?n fueron el cuestionario, el an?lisis documental y el grupo de discusi?n. Para el tratamiento de los datos se hizo un an?lisis estad?stico con el ibm spss v.22 y an?lisis de contenido con Atlas.Ti 7.0 para los datos de naturaleza cualitativa. Se encontr? que los estudiantes leen con frecuencia en pantallas, aunque muchas de sus pr?cticas tienen fines recreativos. Cuando leen con prop?sitos acad?micos, los estudiantes tienen problemas para evaluar la confiabilidad de la informaci?n que encuentran en la Red y consultan con mayor frecuencia fuentes secundarias. Una vez tienen los textos en pantalla, abordan de manera general la informaci?n y transitan por varios documentos a trav?s de hiperv?nculos. Los l?mites entre las actividades de ocio y las acad?micas no est?n bien definidos, pues aparece con frecuencia la multitarea. Los estudiantes indican que son escasas las orientaciones que reciben por parte de los docentes o de la universidad. A partir de estos hallazgos se evidencia que los alumnos se enfrentan constantemente a la lectura digital, pero las pr?cticas que llevan a cabo no siempre les permiten alcanzar sus prop?sitos acad?micos, por lo que es necesario fortalecer los apoyos que se les ofrecen, principalmente desde las aulas de lengua.
This paper presents results of research on digital reading. The main objective of the research was to analyze the reading on screens practices of university students and how their practices are guided by professors and institutions of higher education. The research design was mixed and the type of study was descriptive of cross-sectional. The data collection techniques were questionnaire, document analysis and discussion group. ibm spss v.22 was used for statistical treatment of data and Atlas.Ti 7.0 was used for content analysis of qualitative information. The study showed that students usually read on screens, although many of their reading practices have recreational purposes. Students have troubles to find reliable information on the Internet when they have academic pursuits and frequently consult secondary sources. When texts are on screens, students generally scan information and surf from one document to another along hyperlinks. The boundaries between academic and leisure activities are not well defined; multitasking appears frequently. Students indicate there is a little guidance received from their professors or university. These findings show that students are constantly faced with digital reading, but practices do not always allow them to achieve their academic purposes, so it is necessary to strengthen the support offered to them, mainly from the classroom language./n?
Internet, aparato de lectura, Teaching, lectura, investigación educativa, tecnología de la educación, medios de enseñanza, nuevas tecnologías, Ense?anza, Enseñanza
Internet, aparato de lectura, Teaching, lectura, investigación educativa, tecnología de la educación, medios de enseñanza, nuevas tecnologías, Ense?anza, Enseñanza
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
