
How does linguistic structure affect children's acquisition of early number word meanings? Previous studies have tested this question by comparing how children learning languages with different grammatical representations of number learn the meanings of labels for small numbers, like 1, 2, and 3. For example, children who acquire a language with singular-plural marking, like English, are faster to learn the word for 1 than children learning a language that lacks the singular-plural distinction, perhaps because the word for 1 is always used in singular contexts, highlighting its meaning. These studies are problematic, however, because reported differences in number word learning may be due to unmeasured cross-cultural differences rather than specific linguistic differences. To address this problem, we investigated number word learning in four groups of children from a single culture who spoke different dialects of the same language that differed chiefly with respect to how they grammatically mark number. We found that learning a dialect which features "dual" morphology (marking of pairs) accelerated children's acquisition of the number word two relative to learning a "non-dual" dialect of the same language.
Cross-Cultural Comparison, dual, Science, Slovenia, slovenščina, usvajanje, narečja, dvojina, Language Development, Slovenian, angleščina, števila, grammatical number, English, Humans, Learning, učenje, slovnično število, Language, learning, številke, Q, R, acquisition, dialects, Semantics, numbers, Child, Preschool, Medicine, Female, Research Article
Cross-Cultural Comparison, dual, Science, Slovenia, slovenščina, usvajanje, narečja, dvojina, Language Development, Slovenian, angleščina, števila, grammatical number, English, Humans, Learning, učenje, slovnično število, Language, learning, številke, Q, R, acquisition, dialects, Semantics, numbers, Child, Preschool, Medicine, Female, Research Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 62 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
