
The educational scholarship track represented 1 of 3 tracks of the Ambulatory Pediatric Association/Health Resources and Services Administration faculty development initiative. Two cohorts of participants (N = 38), selected via a peer-review process, took part in a series of three 2-day workshops presented over an 18-month period designed to assist experienced pediatric faculty in becoming more proficient educators. The program was developed through an iterative needs assessment process and consisted of 7 major areas of study and skill development: principles of adult learning; teaching skills; feedback and evaluation; the workshop as a teaching and faculty development tool; curriculum development, implementation, and evaluation; research in medical education; and scholarship and promotion. At program completion, 35 scholars rated themselves on their pre- and postprogram competencies, demonstrating improvement in most areas. Scholars were required to lead educational workshops and reported having led a total of 118 local and 64 regional or national workshops as part of their program participation. There are objective indications that scholars in this track were successful in furthering their careers in medical education.
Male, Faculty, Medical, Pediatrics, United States, Cohort Studies, Ambulatory Care, Humans, Education, Medical, Continuing, Female, Clinical Competence, Curriculum, Staff Development, Fellowships and Scholarships, Program Development, Needs Assessment, Program Evaluation
Male, Faculty, Medical, Pediatrics, United States, Cohort Studies, Ambulatory Care, Humans, Education, Medical, Continuing, Female, Clinical Competence, Curriculum, Staff Development, Fellowships and Scholarships, Program Development, Needs Assessment, Program Evaluation
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
