Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Optics Lettersarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Optics Letters
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Shack–Hartmann versus reverse Hartmann wavefront sensors: experimental results

Authors: Cyril, Pannetier; François, Hénault;

Shack–Hartmann versus reverse Hartmann wavefront sensors: experimental results

Abstract

With respect to the classical Shack–Hartmann (SH) wavefront sensor (WFS), the recently proposed reverse Hartmann (RH) sensor inverts the locations of the filtering and observation planes and forms a direct image of the pupil on a detector array. The slopes of the wavefront error (WFE) are then reconstructed by using a double Fourier transform algorithm. It turns out that the same algorithm can also be applied to the raw data acquired by SH sensors. This Letter presents the first, to the best of our knowledge, experimental results obtained with a simplified RH WFS and their comparison to those provided by a reference SH sensor, in both classical and double Fourier transform modes. They demonstrate that similar WFE measurement accuracy is achievable when using the three techniques, at least within the limit of our test bench that is estimated around λ / 10 RMS.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!