
handle: 11583/2722697 , 11311/942171
The adoption of a flexible grid will benefit the network design and control plane of future optical networks by providing increased adaptability of spectral resources to heterogeneous network conditions. Unfortunately, this flexibility is gained at the cost of significant additional complexity in the network design and control. In this paper, we consider the optimization of routing and spectrum allocation in flexi-grid ring networks and explore the trade-off between network cost (in terms of spectrum and transponder utilization) and problem complexity (in terms of the number of variables/constraints and computational time). Such trade-offs are investigated under multiple assumptions in terms of traffic grooming, regeneration, and modulation/baud rate assignment capabilities and contrasted with the case of fixed grid.We show how in the presence of traffic grooming the additional complexity due to the flexible grid has a minor impact on problem complexity. Similarly, in all the considered scenarios, regeneration and modulation/baud rate assignment do not relevantly impact on problem complexity. We also consider two possible alternative integer linear programming (ILP) models: the slicebased and channel-based approaches. The former handles each slice individually, whereas the latter uses precomputed subsets of contiguous slices of different bandwidths. Both models are solved under several different network settings. Complexity comparison of the ILP models shows that the slice-based approach provides better performance than the channel-based approach and that the performance gap between the two models increases with the introduction of additional flexibility and dimensions.
Assignment and routing algorithms; Flexible grid; Network optimization, Network optimization; assignment and routing algorithms; flexible grid
Assignment and routing algorithms; Flexible grid; Network optimization, Network optimization; assignment and routing algorithms; flexible grid
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 28 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
