
doi: 10.1353/lm.1998.0002
pmid: 9604843
Crawford's essay raises questions about simple, direct observation in medical practice and research by considering how audiences view two of William Dieterle's films, The Story of Louis Pasteur, and Dr. Ehrlich's Magic Bullet. Through a reading of optical practices as well as a close look at the two films, Crawford points out how medicine and its ethics are enmeshed in medicine's optical technologies and its practitioners' ways of seeing.
Europe, Motion Pictures, Medicine in the Arts, Humans, History, 19th Century, History, 20th Century, United States
Europe, Motion Pictures, Medicine in the Arts, Humans, History, 19th Century, History, 20th Century, United States
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
