
This essay juxtaposes a particular a set of novel mathematical ideas from the early nineteenth century with a synchronous development in literary criticism. Important mathematical discoveries of the 1820s, such as non-Euclidean geometries, new impossibility results, and new proof ideals, exhibit structural similarities with notions of Romantic irony expressed by literary critic and philosopher Friedrich Schlegel (1772–1829). The essay shows how both fields—mathematics and literary criticism—were at the time attempting to come to terms with the Kantian divide between the Ding an sich and Ding für uns , and thereby both fields reacted to profound shifts in perspective. By analyzing Schlegel’s notion of Romantic irony in relation to these key mathematical examples the essay presents new insights into the historiographical fields regarding literature and mathematics. This contribution to historiography is twofold: the essay sheds new light on a set of important mathematical developments, while at the same time bringing the historiography of mathematics and literature to bear on each other on a deeper, structural level.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
