
Until about twenty-five years ago, the standard assessment of Margaret Cavendish’s philosophical work was typified by Virginia Woolf’s remarks: “It was from the plain of complete ignorance, the untilled field of her own consciousness, that she proposed to erect a philosophic system that was to oust all others. The results were not altogether happy.”1 Recent studies have been more sympathetic. The current consensus is that Cavendish’s writings were, in fact, informed by the work of her contemporaries, and that she was critiquing the newly popular mechanistic philosophy of nature.2
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
