
doi: 10.1353/cj.0.0144
FanLib's example shows what happens when outside attempts are made to recon figure the field of value in such a way as to attempt to control the community com ponent without the community members' cooperation. One fan, in an open letter to a FanLib insider, says, "You do not understand us and our communities, nor do you respect us. . . . If you want us to participate in your endeavor then make it something in which we would want to participate.. . . You do not come to us as equals and that is your fundamental failing in this endeavor. You cannot build a new community at your site all nicely regimented and controlled because the community already exists and we will not be controlled by the likes of you."18
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 38 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
