
pmid: 8273703
In the past few years, we have witnessed the introduction of a bilingual-bicultural approach and an increasing skepticism of the value of manually coded English in the education of deaf children. The thrust of bilingual-bicultural programs is emphasis on using American Sign Language as the primary language of instruction. However, merely advocating something (i.e., the use of American Sign Language) in no way guarantees its successful implementation. This paper reviews the research on past usage of manually coded English in the classroom for clues as to some of the concerns that American Sign Language might face in its implementation.
Male, Schools, Communication, Teaching, Deafness, Sign Language, Education, Special, Humans, Female
Male, Schools, Communication, Teaching, Deafness, Sign Language, Education, Special, Humans, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
