Daylighting standards: Do we have the correct metrics?

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 01 Jan 2015Publisher:Fakulta elektrotechniky a komunikacnich technologii VUT v BrneJournal:Proceedings of the 21st International Conference LIGHT SVĚTLO 2015

Authors: Peter Raynham;

doi: 10.13164/conf.light.2015.201

Daylighting standards: Do we have the correct metrics?

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

Daylight in buildings is important in a number of ways and can bring benefits to building users and save energy. There are a number of ways to regulate the quality of daylit environments. The paper studies the way daylight adequacy is controlled in current guidance together with other metrics that are in use. These metrics are compared to developing ideas from the world of electric lighting and a new metric to control daylight adequacy is proposed.

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	1
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average