
doi: 10.13128/bae-10567
This paper reviews and discusses the more recent literature and application of Positive Mathematical Programming in the context of agricultural supply models. Specifically, advances in the empirical foundation of parameter specifications as well as the economic rationalisation of PMP models – both criticized in earlier reviews – are investigated. Moreover, the paper provides an overview on a larger set of models with regular/repeated policy application that apply variants of PMP. Results show that most applications today avoid arbitrary parameter specifications and rely on exogenous information on supply responses to calibrate model parameters. However, only few approaches use multiple observations to estimate parameters, which is likely due to the still considerable technical challenges associated with it. Equally, we found only limited reflection on the behavioral or technological assumptions that could rationalise the PMP model structure while still keeping the model’s advantages.
estimation of programming models, SH1-691, Forestry, SD1-669.5, policy impact assessment, Positive Mathematical Programming, estimation of programming models, farm and sector models, policy impact assessment, review, Agricultural and Food Policy, Production Economics, Research Methods/ Statistical Methods, C61, Q12, Q18,, farm and sector models, Aquaculture. Fisheries. Angling, Positive Mathematical Programming
estimation of programming models, SH1-691, Forestry, SD1-669.5, policy impact assessment, Positive Mathematical Programming, estimation of programming models, farm and sector models, policy impact assessment, review, Agricultural and Food Policy, Production Economics, Research Methods/ Statistical Methods, C61, Q12, Q18,, farm and sector models, Aquaculture. Fisheries. Angling, Positive Mathematical Programming
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
