Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Deep Percolation under Center Pivots with No-till

Authors: null D E Eisenhauer; null J H Deck; null S Irmak;

Deep Percolation under Center Pivots with No-till

Abstract

Percolation of water beneath the plant root zone and subsequent flow in the intermediate vadose zone are important processes that affect not only the efficiency of center-pivot irrigation systems but also the transport of contaminants and return flow to the groundwater. No-till planting potentially influences percolation because its impacts on other key hydrologic processes such as evapotranspiration and infiltration. In 2009, investigation of the potential impacts of no-till planting systems on percolation took place at two locations in central Nebraska. At both locations, two center pivot fields were paired, one that has been no-till planted and one that uses two to three field operations annually for seedbed preparation and cultivation. All fields have maintained the tillage practices for at least seven years. Samples of the sediments were collected in the intermediate vadose zone to a depth of 7.5 m. Using the hydraulic properties that were measured and those estimated with pedo-transfer functions along with the water content profiles, percolation rate in zones that have approximate unit hydraulic gradients were estimated. At the first site, tilled volumetric water contents measured between the root zone and the bottom depth of water movement since the practices first began were significantly higher than no-till. Average volumetric water contents were 0.39 and 0.38 m3/m3 for tilled and no-till, respectively. The second site showed a similar trend, although not significant, with 0.30 m3/m3 found for the tilled field and 0.28 m3/m3 for no-till. Mean pore water velocity was 0.43 m yr-1 and 0.97 m yr-1 for tilled fields and 0.53 and 0.58 in no-till fields.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!