
pmid: 1670451
Of 54 patients with posterior dislocations of the hip of type I and type II (Stewart and Milford 1954), 47 were followed for a mean period of 6.7 years (2 to 11). Of these, 23 had dislocation with minimal lesions of the acetabulum (type I) and 24 had an avulsed dorsocranial fragment (type II). All were reduced by closed methods within six hours. The subsequent treatment of type I dislocations was conservative. At the beginning of the period type II injuries were treated conservatively, but surgery was increasingly chosen for later cases. Type I dislocations had significantly better results (p < 0.05) than type II fracture-dislocations, regardless of the method of treatment. There were no essential differences between the results of surgical and conservative treatment in type II dislocations.
Adult, Male, Time Factors, Adolescent, Hip Fractures, Pain, Peripheral Nervous System Diseases, Middle Aged, Combined Modality Therapy, Disability Evaluation, Treatment Outcome, Hip Dislocation, Humans, Female, Gait, Follow-Up Studies
Adult, Male, Time Factors, Adolescent, Hip Fractures, Pain, Peripheral Nervous System Diseases, Middle Aged, Combined Modality Therapy, Disability Evaluation, Treatment Outcome, Hip Dislocation, Humans, Female, Gait, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 46 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
