
Abstract This article advocates the use of developing individual core ethical values as the first step in a process of using one's own principles as a means of keeping focused and grounded. The article does not stop but encourages the reader to actually use the value through the introduction of a straightforward yet sophisticated decision model. However, the article introduces the notion that the ethical environment of the institution for which the religious professional works needs also to be analyzed through the use of an ethics audit. Using these three basic tools (core values, decision model and ethics audit), the religious professional will be better able to understand the dissonance between one's values when compared with one's actions and take important steps to bridge the gap in an effective and healthly manner.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
