
Consider the two-person zero-sum game in which two investors are each allowed to invest in a market with stocks (X1, X2, …, Xm) ∼ F, where Xi ≥ 0. Each investor has one unit of capital. The goal is to achieve more money than one’s opponent. Allowable portfolio strategies are random investment policies B ∈ Rm, B ≥ 0, E ∑ mi = 1Bi = 1. The payoff to player 1 for policy B1 vs. B2 is P {Bt1 X ≥ Bt2 X}. The optimal policy is shown to be B* = Ub*, where U is a random variable uniformly distributed on [0, 2], and b* maximizes E ln bt X over b ≥ 0, ∑ bi = 1. Curiously, this competitively optimal investment policy b* is the same policy that achieves the maximum possible growth rate of capital in repeated independent investments (Breiman [Breiman, L. 1961. Optimal gambling systems for favorable games. Fourth Berkeley Symposium. 1 65–78.] and Kelly [Kelly, J. 1956. A new interpretation of information rate. Bell System Tech. J. 917–926.]). Thus the immediate goal of outperforming another investor is perfectly compatible with maximizing the asymptotic rate of return.
two investors, asymptotic rate of return, competitive optimality, 2-person games, Operations research and management science, two-person zero-sum game, random investment policies, logarithmic investment, Other game-theoretic models, portfolio selection, optimal policy
two investors, asymptotic rate of return, competitive optimality, 2-person games, Operations research and management science, two-person zero-sum game, random investment policies, logarithmic investment, Other game-theoretic models, portfolio selection, optimal policy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 97 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
