
doi: 10.12705/635.32
handle: 10161/21758
AbstractHere we present the first nuclear phylogeny for Cystopteridaceae (Polypodiales), using the single‐copy locusgapCp“short”. This phylogeny corroborates broad results from plastid data in demonstrating strong support for the monophyly of the family's three genera—Cystopteris, Acystopteris, andGymnocarpium—and of the major groups withinCystopteris(C. montana, the sudetica and bulbifera clades, and theC. fragiliscomplex). In addition, it confirms the rampant hybridization (allopolyploidy) that has long been suspected within bothCystopterisandGymnocarpium. In some cases, these data provide the first DNA‐sequence‐based evidence for previous hypotheses of polyploid species origins (such as the cosmopolitanG. dryopterisbeing an allotetraploid derivative of the diploidsG. appalachianumandG. disjunctum). Most of the allopolyploids, however, have no formal taxonomic names. This pattern is particularly strong within theC. fragiliscomplex, where our results imply that the eight included accessions of “C. fragilis” represent at least six distinct allopolyploid taxa.
580, Evolutionary Biology, Science & Technology, COMPLEX, CHROMOSOME, Plant Sciences, FERNS, DRYOPTERIDACEAE, amplicon cloning, DNA, reticulate evolution, Cystopteris fragilis, fern phylogeny, NORTH-AMERICAN, ORIGINS, MORPHOLOGICAL EVOLUTION, PTERIDOPHYTA, Gymnocarpium, species complex, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, hybridization
580, Evolutionary Biology, Science & Technology, COMPLEX, CHROMOSOME, Plant Sciences, FERNS, DRYOPTERIDACEAE, amplicon cloning, DNA, reticulate evolution, Cystopteris fragilis, fern phylogeny, NORTH-AMERICAN, ORIGINS, MORPHOLOGICAL EVOLUTION, PTERIDOPHYTA, Gymnocarpium, species complex, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, hybridization
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 28 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
