
doi: 10.1257/mac.20150229
handle: 11565/4013819
We build a medium-scale DSGE model and calibrate it to fit the main macroeconomic variables during the US Great Recession. Using it to evaluate the welfare effects of increasing government consumption at the zero lower bound beyond what was actually observed in the data, we reach three main results. First, the increase in government consumption after 2008, albeit small in present value terms, was close to optimal. Second, frontloading the same stimulus would have been welfare-improving. Third, larger welfare effects occur in our model for parameter values implying either large welfare costs of modest recessions (e.g., high consumption curvature), or outright large recessions. (JEL E12, E32, E43, E62, H50)
government spending multiplier; welfare; zero lower bound, GOVERNMENT SPENDING MULTIPLIER, ZERO LOWER BOUND, WELFARE, GREAT RECESSION, FISCAL STIMULUS, jel: jel:D91, jel: jel:E62, jel: jel:E21
government spending multiplier; welfare; zero lower bound, GOVERNMENT SPENDING MULTIPLIER, ZERO LOWER BOUND, WELFARE, GREAT RECESSION, FISCAL STIMULUS, jel: jel:D91, jel: jel:E62, jel: jel:E21
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
