
The main theorem is the following inequality between binomial and their approximating normal tail probabilities: if \(p\leq1/4\) and \(k\geq np\), or if \(p\leq1/2\) and \(np\leq k\leq n(1-p)\), then the binomial probability \(\sum\limits_{j=k}^nb(j,n,p)\geq1-\Phi((k-np)/(npq)^{1/2})\). The tools of proof are elementary. The point of view taken is that such distribution inequalities reveal systematic errors in the common approximations used in tests of significance. The results are applied directly to construct significance tests concervative with respect to type II errors.
tail probabilities, Combinatorial probability, 60C05, Binomial, Exact distribution theory in statistics, 62E15, Poisson and normal laws, conservative test
tail probabilities, Combinatorial probability, 60C05, Binomial, Exact distribution theory in statistics, 62E15, Poisson and normal laws, conservative test
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 48 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
