
arXiv: 2002.02629
We establish statistical properties of random-weighting methods in LASSO regression under different regularization parameters $λ_n$ and suitable regularity conditions. The random-weighting methods in view concern repeated optimization of a randomized objective function, motivated by the need for computational approximations to Bayesian posterior sampling. In the context of LASSO regression, we repeatedly assign analyst-drawn random weights to terms in the objective function (including the penalty terms), and optimize to obtain a sample of random-weighting estimators. We show that existing approaches have conditional model selection consistency and conditional asymptotic normality at different growth rates of $λ_n$ as $n \to \infty$. We propose an extension to the available random-weighting methods and establish that the resulting samples attain conditional sparse normality and conditional consistency in a growing-dimension setting. We find that random-weighting has both approximate-Bayesian and sampling-theory interpretations. Finally, we illustrate the proposed methodology via extensive simulation studies and a benchmark data example.
Update data presentation
weighted Bayesian bootstrap, FOS: Computer and information sciences, Ridge regression; shrinkage estimators (Lasso), perturbation bootstrap, consistency, Bootstrap, jackknife and other resampling methods, Bayesian inference, weighted likelihood bootstrap, LASSO, model selection consistency, Methodology (stat.ME), 62F12, 62F40, 62F15, random weights, bootstrap, Asymptotic properties of parametric estimators, Statistics - Methodology
weighted Bayesian bootstrap, FOS: Computer and information sciences, Ridge regression; shrinkage estimators (Lasso), perturbation bootstrap, consistency, Bootstrap, jackknife and other resampling methods, Bayesian inference, weighted likelihood bootstrap, LASSO, model selection consistency, Methodology (stat.ME), 62F12, 62F40, 62F15, random weights, bootstrap, Asymptotic properties of parametric estimators, Statistics - Methodology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
