
arXiv: 1808.08491
Bayesian hypothesis testing is re-examined from the perspective of an a priori assessment of the test statistic distribution under the alternative. By assessing the distribution of an observable test statistic, rather than prior parameter values, we provide a practical default Bayes factor which is straightforward to interpret. To illustrate our methodology, we provide examples where evidence for a Bayesian strikingly supports the null, but leads to rejection under a classical test. Finally, we conclude with directions for future research.
multiple comparisons, Bayesian inference, Mathematics - Statistics Theory, Statistics Theory (math.ST), Bayesian, Parametric hypothesis testing, Bayes factor, Bayes factors, hypothesis testing, FOS: Mathematics, test statistic, $p$-value
multiple comparisons, Bayesian inference, Mathematics - Statistics Theory, Statistics Theory (math.ST), Bayesian, Parametric hypothesis testing, Bayes factor, Bayes factors, hypothesis testing, FOS: Mathematics, test statistic, $p$-value
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
