
In this paper a robust version of the classical Wald test statistics for linear hypothesis in the logistic regression model is introduced and its properties are explored. We study the problem under the assumption of random covariates although some ideas with non random covariates are also considered. The family of tests considered is based on the minimum density power divergence estimator instead of the maximum likelihood estimator and it is referred to as the Wald-type test statistic in the paper. We obtain the asymptotic distribution and also study the robustness properties of the Wald type test statistic. The robustness of the tests is investigated theoretically through the influence function analysis as well as suitable practical examples. It is theoretically established that the level as well as the power of the Wald-type tests are stable against contamination, while the classical Wald type test breaks down in this scenario. Some classical examples are presented which numerically substantiate the theory developed. Finally a simulation study is included to provide further confirmation of the validity of the theoretical results established in the paper.
Influence function, Estadística matemática (Matemáticas), logistic regression, 1209 Estadística, Minimum density power divergence estimators, Logistic regression, Mathematics - Statistics Theory, robustness, Statistics Theory (math.ST), 662F05, minimum density power divergence estimators, Random explanatory variables, Wald-type test statistics, random explanatory variables, FOS: Mathematics, Robustness, 62F35
Influence function, Estadística matemática (Matemáticas), logistic regression, 1209 Estadística, Minimum density power divergence estimators, Logistic regression, Mathematics - Statistics Theory, robustness, Statistics Theory (math.ST), 662F05, minimum density power divergence estimators, Random explanatory variables, Wald-type test statistics, random explanatory variables, FOS: Mathematics, Robustness, 62F35
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 36 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
