
doi: 10.1179/bjo.18.4.267
pmid: 1838280
The findings of some 26 papers covering the results of Andresen and Fränkel appliances, as analysed from cephalometric radiographs, are reviewed. These findings show a high degree of consistency. They have been combined to produce larger samples and compared with a control group produced from reports of untreated Class II division 1 individuals, with consequent gains in statistical significance. Generally, there is no appreciable holding back of maxillary advancement in either group (although a slight relative reduction in the angle SNA). There is a slight mean increase in mandibular growth, mainly in a vertical direction. This seems similar to that reported by several authors in conventional appliances. There is a wide variation in response.
Cephalometry, Vertical Dimension, Activator Appliances, Mandible, Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Facial Bones, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Orthodontic Appliances, Maxilla, Humans, Nasal Bone
Cephalometry, Vertical Dimension, Activator Appliances, Mandible, Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Facial Bones, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Orthodontic Appliances, Maxilla, Humans, Nasal Bone
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 73 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
