Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao The American Surgeonarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Resection of Benign Duodenal Neoplasms

Authors: Robert T. Russell; Clinton D. Kemp; Kenneth W. Sharp;

Resection of Benign Duodenal Neoplasms

Abstract

Primary small bowel neoplasms (PSBN) are uncommon, accounting for less than 15 per cent of all gastrointestinal tumors. Benign duodenal neoplasms (BDN) are rare, comprising only 10 to 20 per cent of all PSBN. The treatment is generally surgical resection ranging from local excision to pancreaticoduodenectomy depending on size, location, and number of lesions. Patients undergoing surgical treatment for BDN at Vanderbilt University Medical Center from July 1984 to April 2006, were identified and reviewed retrospectively. Medical records were examined for demographics, operative details, results, and complications. Twenty-six patients were identified of which 56 per cent were male and the mean age was 56 ± 14 years. Lesions were found throughout the duodenum, but the majority (62%) were ampullary. Nearly 75 per cent were adenomas, including over half with dysplasia. Operative interventions and complication rates were: duodenal resection with primary anastomosis (n = 3, 0%), local excision (n = 6, 50%), ampullary resection (n = 10, 30%), and pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 7, 86%). There were no reoperations or mortalities. Mean followup was 14 months. BDN are an increasingly common problem in an era of frequent use of upper endoscopy. The surgical management of these lesions must be tailored to their size, number, location, and malignant potential. A wide variety of surgical procedures can be performed with acceptable morbidity.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adenoma, Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors, Biopsy, Carcinoid Tumor, Middle Aged, Pancreaticoduodenectomy, Paraganglioma, Treatment Outcome, Duodenal Neoplasms, Humans, Female, Lipoma, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Duodenoscopy, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    25
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
25
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?